<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace Site Server v5.11.81 (http://www.squarespace.com/) on Thu, 16 Feb 2012 08:58:55 GMT--><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><title>Life Zero</title><subtitle>Journal</subtitle><id>http://scruffythinking.com/journal/</id><link rel="alternate" type="application/xhtml+xml" href="http://scruffythinking.com/journal/"/><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://scruffythinking.com/journal/atom.xml"/><updated>2011-12-21T01:18:57Z</updated><generator uri="http://www.squarespace.com/" version="Squarespace Site Server v5.11.81 (http://www.squarespace.com/)">Squarespace</generator><entry><title>A Scruffy Song</title><category term="Scruffy"/><category term="Scruffy Thinking"/><category term="music"/><category term="song"/><category term="video"/><id>http://scruffythinking.com/journal/2011/12/20/a-scruffy-song.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://scruffythinking.com/journal/2011/12/20/a-scruffy-song.html"/><author><name>Kanen</name></author><published>2011-12-21T01:03:32Z</published><updated>2011-12-21T01:03:32Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>I enlisted <a href="http://fiverr.com/guitario">Guitario</a> to create a new music video for Scruffy Thinking, just for fun.</p>

<p>Here is the result.</p>

<iframe width="640" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/UqFN9KaRhuY?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
]]></content></entry><entry><title>Steve Jobs 1955-2011</title><category term="RIP"/><category term="Steve Jobs"/><id>http://scruffythinking.com/journal/2011/10/5/steve-jobs-1955-2011.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://scruffythinking.com/journal/2011/10/5/steve-jobs-1955-2011.html"/><author><name>Kanen</name></author><published>2011-10-06T01:36:56Z</published><updated>2011-10-06T01:36:56Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p><center>
<span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img src="http://scruffythinking.com/storage/Steve.png?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1318052645199" alt=""/></span></span>
<small><a href="http://500px.com/katsanes">Photo taken by Ryan Katsanes</a></small>
</center></p>

<h3>Updated: October 5, 2011</h3>

<blockquote>
  <p>“Your time is limited, so don’t waste it living someone else’s life. Don’t be trapped by dogma – which is living with the results of other people’s thinking. Don’t let the noise of other’s opinions drown out your own inner voice. And most important, have the courage to follow your heart and intuition. They somehow already know what you truly want to become. Everything else is secondary.” -- <a href="http://www.Apple.com">Steve Jobs</a></p>
</blockquote>

<p>Today is a truly sad day for all of us.</p>

<p>Steve, you touched each of us personally and <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2011/10/05/president-obama-passing-steve-jobs-he-changed-way-each-us-sees-world">influenced</a> generations of great minds, designers, <a href="http://www.quora.com/What-is-the-best-way-to-frame-the-impact-Steve-Jobs-life-had-on-technology/answer/Colin-Barrett?srid=z47">coders</a>, artists and madmen. </p>

<p>We <em>think different</em> because of you.</p>

<p>You will be missed, each and every day.</p>
]]></content></entry><entry><title>Thunderbolt impressions...</title><category term="Technology"/><category term="Thunderbolt"/><category term="air"/><category term="apple"/><id>http://scruffythinking.com/journal/2011/10/5/thunderbolt-impressions.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://scruffythinking.com/journal/2011/10/5/thunderbolt-impressions.html"/><author><name>Kanen</name></author><published>2011-10-05T19:16:53Z</published><updated>2011-10-05T19:16:53Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>I recently picked up an external, <a href="http://store.apple.com/us/product/H7150ZM/A/lacie-little-big-disk-thunderbolt-series-hard-drive">1 TB Thunderbolt drive from LaCie</a>. It required the purchase of a <a href="http://store.apple.com/us/product/MC913ZM/A?mco=MTY3ODQ5OTY">$50 Thunderbolt cable</a>.</p>

<p>The idea was, given the tiny little hard drive on my MacBook Air, I'd use the Thunderbolt for external storage for everything I'm doing.</p>

<p><img src="http://www.lacie.com/imgstore/product_large/LBD_TB_CameraUseCase.jpg" alt="Thunderbolt!" title="" /></p>

<h2>Initial Impressions</h2>

<p>The Thunderbolt drive is fast. It's surprisingly fast, even under heavy CPU load.</p>

<p>I tried a variety of benchmarks and settled on two. The first is the <a href="">AJA System Test</a> and the second is my own <a href="http://scruffythinking.com/dst/">HD Speed Test</a> (which accurately measures real video going through the CPU, GPU and OS X libraries).</p>

<p>In the case of the AJA System Test, I benchmarked three drives:</p>

<h3>Western Digital 1TB USB 2</h3>

<p>As expected, this drive is slow. Unfortunately, as I've gone on and on about for years on podcasts, in person and on my blog, the USB standard is one of the stupidest data transfer systems ever created by anyone. It is serial, but requires <em>heavy processing power</em> to encode and decode the serial information.</p>

<p>So, a theoretically 480 Mb/s (or 60 MB/s) drive ends up being 320 Mb/s (approximately 40 MB/s) and eats up 30% or more of your system processor just moving data around. Read speeds are slightly higher, for a variety of reasons, but still way under the expected speed of the advertised speed of the transport.</p>

<p>Anyway...</p>

<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img src="http://scruffythinking.com/storage/ExtUSB.png?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1317843009870" alt=""/></span></span></p>

<h3>Internal, MacBook Air SSD</h3>

<blockquote>
  <p>You can't edit video on a MacBook Air!</p>
</blockquote>

<p>How many times have I heard this phrase since the original Air came out and I was editing video on that too. Remember, much of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_Image_Animation_System">Star Wars: Episode 1 used computers</a> which are so much less powerful than the MacBook Air. Anyway, I digress.</p>

<p>The internal SSD on the MacBook Air is fast. AJA Speed Test kind of flakes out on it, but it's obviously more than the pathetic 29 MB/s writes and 36 MB/s reads from the USB 2 drive above.</p>

<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img src="http://scruffythinking.com/storage/IntSSD.png?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1317843279040" alt=""/></span></span></p>

<p>Some of my testing has shown more than 100 MB/s during some short-burst operations.</p>

<h3>LaCie 1TB Thunderbolt</h3>

<p>Here's where the inclusion of a controller chip in the cable the the offloading of data transfer from the processor really starts to pay off. The LaCie just flies through data and the MacBook Air's processor doesn't even break a sweat during even the largest of operations.</p>

<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img src="http://scruffythinking.com/storage/ExtThunderbolt.png?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1317843526328" alt=""/></span></span></p>

<p>AJA says ~180 MB/s reads and ~150 MB/s writes, but it also shows a wildly inconsistent burst during reads and writes and I am suspicious of their "average speed" during this process.</p>

<p>I load up my own program, HD Speed Test, and benchmark the drive using <em>real video processing</em> to see what's up.</p>

<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img src="http://scruffythinking.com/storage/HDST1080p.png?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1317843638099" alt=""/></span></span></p>

<p>Not as pretty, but the same inconsistent read and write speeds, with the same strange trailing off toward the end of the reads/writes and a spattering of peaks and valleys as the data transfer completes.</p>

<p><strong>Sustained Speed: 93.8 MB/s</strong></p>

<p>Not bad! 2+ simultaneous streams of 1080p HD video and realtime capture on RED 4k video!</p>

<h2>The not-so-good</h2>

<p>The LaCie 1TB drive is pretty expensive. It clocks in at $450 with the Thunderbolt cable.</p>

<p>The drive itself is quite small, but it is <em>heavy</em>, weighing as much as an Apple iPad.</p>

<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img src="http://scruffythinking.com/storage/ThunderCords.png?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1317850390276" alt=""/></span></span></p>

<p>The Thunderbolt cable is super long. Like 2 meters long. It coils like a giant snake next to my laptop. I wish there were a shorter version.</p>

<p>As mentioned in other places, the small connections on either end of the Thunderbolt cable (attached to the computer and attached to the drive) get hot. We are talking bottom-of-the-MacBook-hot, after sustained data copies -- even from USB to Thunderbolt.</p>

<h2>My overall impression</h2>

<p>Someone reviewed this drive in <a href="http://store.apple.com/us/product/H7150ZM/A/lacie-little-big-disk-thunderbolt-series-hard-drive?mco=MTY3ODQ5OTY">the Online Apple Store</a> and said:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>My WD and Seagate regular USB 2.0 are barely audible with the exception of a few "clicks," while this sounds like an old PC's fan, ready for takeoff.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>This is completely <em>false</em>. The LaCie Little Big Disk is super quiet, even under heavy load. I have it next to my laptop, on my desk, and -- as sensitive as I am to noise -- I have <em>never</em> heard the LaCie make any fan-related sound.</p>

<p>I'm guessing the $999.00 (or higher) <a href="http://store.apple.com/us/product/H5184VC/A/Thunderbolt?mco=MTY3ODQ5OTY">Promise Pegasus RAID</a> is significantly faster. I've seen the benchmarks from <a href="https://plus.google.com/113627723455361937620/posts/ZZKgQk2vMH8">Victor Cajiao of Typical Mac User</a> (who was also on an episode of <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/scruffy-thinking/id451077510">Scruffy Thinking</a> <a href="http://www.macworld.com/article/160819/2011/06/pegasusr6thunderbolt.html">and from Macworld</a> and they are impressive, but the system is not portable, so...</p>

<p>I think the price is still a bit high.</p>
]]></content></entry><entry><title>Cedric is Scruffy</title><category term="Podcasts"/><category term="Scruffy Thinking"/><id>http://scruffythinking.com/journal/2011/9/6/cedric-is-scruffy.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://scruffythinking.com/journal/2011/9/6/cedric-is-scruffy.html"/><author><name>Kanen</name></author><published>2011-09-07T00:42:13Z</published><updated>2011-09-07T00:42:13Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>I had the good fortune to once again interact with Cedric Crowley.</p>

<p>This time, he graciously agreed to help me record the video introduction to my <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/scruffy-thinking/id451077510">Scruffy Thinking podcast</a>.</p>

<iframe width="560" height="345" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/ZpBftfpQk00" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

<h3>Editing</h3>

<p>This video was put together using Final Cut Pro X, just to see if it could be done. The answer is <em>yes</em>, but it crashed three times while I was being tutored by an actual Apple Employee during a <a href="http://store.apple.com/us/browse/campaigns/onetoone">One to One</a> session (which came with my MacBook Air).</p>

<p>Seemed like a good idea at the time.</p>

<p>I am considering re-creating this video in <a href="http://www.avid.com">Media Composer</a>. I might even do a video comparison.</p>

<h2>Original Cedric Interview</h2>

<p>If you missed the original interview with Cedric, it is linked below.</p>

<iframe width="560" height="400" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/4-izYvJlpyc?hl=en&fs=1" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
]]></content></entry><entry><title>Making other plans...</title><category term="Jake Forgotten"/><category term="Lisp"/><category term="Scruffy Thinking"/><category term="Technology"/><category term="newLisp"/><category term="that post show"/><id>http://scruffythinking.com/journal/2011/8/21/making-other-plans.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://scruffythinking.com/journal/2011/8/21/making-other-plans.html"/><author><name>Kanen</name></author><published>2011-08-22T03:59:20Z</published><updated>2011-08-22T03:59:20Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<h3>Update!</h3>

<p>I had the good fortune to once again interact with Cedric Crowley.</p>

<p>This time, he graciously agreed to help me record the video introduction to my Scruffy Thinking podcast.</p>

<iframe width="560" height="345" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/ZpBftfpQk00" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

<h3>Original Entry</h3>

<p>The great <a href="http://thinkexist.com/quotation/life_is_what_happens_to_you_while_you-re_busy/171775.html">John Lennon</a> once said,</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Life is what happens to you while you're busy making other plans.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>I feel this very strongly right now. Just about everything I thought in my twenties turns out to be either missing or gone from my life now. Everything has been replaced with something different -- and, in almost every instance, something better.</p>

<p>As you've likely read or seen, I'm busy with (potentially too many) projects.</p>

<h2>ME EDIT PRETTY ONE DAY<sup>*</sup></h2>

<p><center><a href="http://www.indiegogo.com/Jake-Forgotten-The-Film"><img src="http://scruffythinking.com/storage/JakeSS.png?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1313987304815" alt="Jake Forgotten + IndieGogo"/></a><small><br>Jake Forgotten: The Film (on IndieGogo)</small></center></p>

<p>As I write this Journal, there are 42 days left to <a href="http://www.indiegogo.com/Jake-Forgotten-The-Film">donate to Jake Forgotten</a> on <a href="http://www.indiegogo.com/Jake-Forgotten-The-Film">IndieGogo</a> and help me get my feature film finished and submitted to festivals.</p>

<p><strong>Jake Forgotten</strong> has been an ongoing project for several years. It was shot in 2007 and I've had three editors work on a final cut. I was never really satisfied with the result, so I shelved the project, took a long trip, focused on some other projects and gave myself time to come back to it and finish the film.</p>

<p>Now, I just need to pull in some extra footage, buy the rights to some music, establish the company and start submitting to festivals. I'm hoping to be shown at festivals starting in early 2012.</p>

<p>There are some great <a href="http://www.indiegogo.com/Jake-Forgotten-The-Film">contribution options</a> starting at just $10 US. For more, you can get film credit or even help with the final edit.</p>

<h2>Artful Code</h2>

<p>I took over the <a href="http://www.scruffythinking.com/artful">Artful Code newLisp Modules</a>, which were some of the best <a href="http://www.newlisp.org">newLisp</a> modules ever written, from <a href="http://www.artfulcode.net">Jeff Ober</a>.</p>

<p>As the new maintainer, I have big plans for integrating several of the modules into a consolidated framework for Web and Packet Handling, which will eventually replace everything else I am using. It is licensed under a non-restrictive <a href="http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php">MIT License</a>, which means you can use it however you want, without paying anyone anything.</p>

<h3>More Lessons?</h3>

<p>I will start writing more <em>New Lessons in Lisp</em> soon. They will be focused initially on the <em>Artful Lisp</em> modules I am maintaining and how to create dynamic web sites and other cool programs. I am hoping to do this to coincide with updating the <em>Artful Code</em> to be more modern and work in the latest version of <a href="http://www.newlisp.org">newLisp</a>.</p>

<h2>Scruffy Thinking</h2>

<p>I am blown away by the guests and the response to the <a href="http://www.twitter.com">@ScruffyThinking</a> podcast. Many people are <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/scruffy-thinking/id451077510">downloading it on iTunes</a> or <a href="http://scruffythinking.com/scruffy/rss.xml">subscribing to the RSS</a>.</p>

<p>I've had <a href="http://www.twitter.com/cbarrett">Colin Barrett</a>,  <a href="http://www.merlinmann.com">Merlin Mann</a>, <a href="http://www.DigitalComposting.com">Ron Brinkmann</a>, <a href="http://about.me/craigsyverson">Craig Syverson</a>, <a href="http://www.ventureblog.com/">David Hornik</a>,  <a href="http://www.knowtech.tv">John Foster</a>, and <a href="http://www.michaelcritz.com">Michael Critz</a> on the show.</p>

<p>I've recorded shows with <a href="http://www.TypicalMacUser.com">Victor Cajiao</a> and <a href="http://www.ZeFrank.com">Ze Frank</a> and have several other shows coming up with equally awesome guests.</p>

<p>Sponsors, like the amazing <a href="http://www.ByWordApp.com">@BywordApp</a> and <a href="http://www.BareBones.com">BareBones Software</a> are coming in and offering free software to our listeners.</p>

<h3>A Small Request (from me, personally)</h3>

<p>I will be giving away copies of <em>BBEdit</em>, <em>ByWord</em>, <em>Final Draft</em> and many other awesome products. </p>

<p>I'd love it if you <a href="http://twitter.com/ScruffyThinking">followed the show</a> on Twitter or <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/scruffy-thinking/id451077510">wrote a review in iTunes</a>. <em>Plus -- you are entered to win free software whenever you do any of these things.</em></p>

<h3>A Bigger Question (from me, personally)</h3>

<p>I originally planned to release <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/scruffy-thinking/id451077510">Scruffy Thinking</a> every other week, on Thursdays. I was worried I wouldn't be able to get enough interesting guests or keep up with the show schedule. So far, I have 5 episodes recorded which have not aired yet!  At the rate of 1 every 2 weeks, that's 10 weeks before you get to hear <a href="http://www.ZeFrank.com">Ze Frank</a>, for example.</p>

<p>So... my question is,</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Do you want to get the podcast every Thursday?</p>
</blockquote>

<p>And, also...</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Do you prefer episodes with more or less guests?</p>
</blockquote>

<p>If so, <a href="http://www.ScruffyThinking.com/contact">send me an e-mail</a> or a <a href="http://twitter.com/ScruffyThinking">tweet</a> and let me know. The more people who rate the show and follow @ScruffyThinking, the more likely it is for me to release the show more often.</p>

<h2>That Post Show</h2>

<p>I recorded the first episodes of <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/that-post-show/id293692362">That Post Show</a> in early 2008. I took two years off and start recording again a few months ago.</p>

<p>The show comes out every other Tuesday and we've had <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/that-post-show/id293692362">amazing guests</a> on the show since the first episode.</p>

<p>I'm proud to have snagged <a href="http://www.RedGiantSoftware.com">Red Giant Software</a> as a sponsor, along with two others I cannot yet mention.</p>

<p>Like <em>Scruffy Thinking</em>, we will be giving out free copies of great software to our listeners.</p>

<h3>Another Selfish Request</h3>

<p>If you like the show, please <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/that-post-show/id293692362">take a moment</a> and <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/that-post-show/id293692362">rate the show</a> in iTunes. It helps a lot, really.</p>

<p>You can also <a href="http://twitter.com/ThatPostShow">follow That Post Show</a> on Twitter or <a href="http://scruffythinking.com/thatpostshow/rss.xml">subscribe to the RSS feed</a> if you don't like iTunes.</p>

<p>Everyone who follows @ThatPostShow or Rates the Show in iTunes or <a href="http://www.ScruffyThinking.com/contact">sends an email</a>, is automatically entered to win cool software.</p>

<h2>Sponsorship</h2>

<p>Lastly, I just wanted to point out something important. I have no interest in littering my shows with a half-dozen five (or more) minute ads. I podcast because I love the topics, I love the people and I love the listeners.  It has always been my goal to provide something interesting -- and hopefully new -- to everyone. Giving away software and having  Sponsors we actually use (and like) is very important to me.</p>

<p>If you ever see me doing anything else, <a href="http://www.twitter.com/kanendosei">send me a tweet</a> or an <a href="http://www.ScruffyThinking.com/contact">email</a> and call me out.</p>

<p>Because, <a href="http://5by5.tv/b2w">like the man says</a>, I really do love you guys.<sup>1</sup></p>

<p><sup>*</sup><small>Apologies to <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0316776963/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=scrufthink-20">David Sedaris</a> who, I hope, can appreciate what I am trying to accomplish with this film.</small></p>

<p><sup>1</sup> <small>And, by beating you up with 20 minutes of advertising in a 90 minute show, I just feel cheap and lame.</small></p>
]]></content></entry><entry><title>Edit Pro SuperGood!</title><category term="Avid"/><category term="FCPX"/><category term="Final Cut"/><category term="Movies &amp; Film"/><category term="Technology"/><category term="media composer"/><id>http://scruffythinking.com/journal/2011/8/1/edit-pro-supergood.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://scruffythinking.com/journal/2011/8/1/edit-pro-supergood.html"/><author><name>Kanen</name></author><published>2011-08-01T22:55:49Z</published><updated>2011-08-01T22:55:49Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img src="http://scruffythinking.com/storage/fcpx.png?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1312858049237" alt=""/></span></span></p>

<h2>Some artificial history, with a few good points</h2>

<p>Imagine, for a moment, there is a piece of software. Let's call it "Edit Pro". This software has been going for years, steadily being improved, until it has thousands of features. It's a bit of a house of cards, and probably needs a major overhaul, but it mostly works and millions of people use it every day and love it deeply.</p>

<p>Now imagine, if you will, there's a competitor called "Avid". This competitor, over the last three years, has had major parts of its system rewritten and it works, without fail, all the time. Avid is less popular and less well known among the consumer market. Also, those who use and love it do so with an open mind and are <em>willing to switch</em> if something better comes along.</p>

<p>At this point, I am partially certain many of you are saying, </p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Willing to switch?!? You are insane.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>I do not believe I am insane. I've spent time with dozens of Avid users. </p>

<p>They all have one thing in common: they are not fanatical about their tool, they are fanatical about their work and their results.</p>

<p>When you are not religious about your software, you are always willing to switch.</p>

<h2>Enter -- Edit Pro SuperGood!</h2>

<p>Then, suddenly and with very little warning, Edit Pro is gone and the company comes out with the new version, Edit Pro SuperGood! (with an exclamation point, so you know it's awesomeness dipped in a layer of thick awesome sauce).</p>

<ul>
<li>Edit Pro is no longer available.</li>
<li>There is no upgrade from Edit Pro to Edit Pro SuperGood!</li>
<li>Edit Pro SuperGood! is missing thousands of features.</li>
</ul>

<p>Official word is,</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Completely rewritten. Now with scrubbing bubbles! Way better than before! Trust us, we know what's good for you!</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Edit Pro SuperGood! sells like crazy. The first few weeks hit the previous number of (paid) installed users of Edit Pro.</p>

<h2>Reality Check, please!</h2>

<p>Way before now, you realized I was talking about <a href="http://www.apple.com/finalcutpro">Final Cut Pro X</a>.</p>

<p>I say these things to both be preposterous and to make you appreciate exactly how this felt to die-hard Final Cut Pro users. It seemed insane. Final Cut Pro X was missing a thousand features we had in Final Cut Pro, including the ability to import previous, Final Cut Pro projects.</p>

<p>Final Cut Pro X is an island, with a promise to build shipping routes to distant shores <em>in the future</em>. Not much mention of the actual ships which will move cargo, by the way.</p>

<h2>Perspectives</h2>

<p>I have a very specific perspective on Final Cut Pro X, <strike>which makes it unusable for me and - I would hope - anyone else who does any professional editing</strike> potentially usable, depending on the situation.</p>

<p>It's not the lack of features. It's not the inability to import previous versions of the software (although this does suck). It's not the lack of multicam support.</p>

<p>It's the replacing of Quicktime with <a href="http://developer.apple.com/library/ios/#documentation/AudioVideo/Conceptual/AVFoundationPG/Articles/00_Introduction.html">AV Foundation</a> and what that means for every aspect of the software.</p>

<p>When Apple decided to move from a Quicktime-based video foundation to an AV Foundation, they made a very specific choice. </p>

<p>The <em>idea</em> was simple, a new foundation -- better than the <em>outdated</em> Quicktime -- which could be cross-platform and work on all (Apple) devices.</p>

<p>Never mind we (and many camera manufacturers) have standardized on Quicktime. Nevermind that ProRes is a standard, even one that <a href="http://www.avid.com/US/products/Media-Composer/features">Avid has adopted</a>. Even one that <a href="http://www.aja.com/products/io/io-express.php">AJA i/o supports natively</a>.</p>

<p>And, even with all this in mind, a new standard is the least of the issue, once the new AV Foundation gets put into practice.</p>

<iframe width="560" height="349" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/SgXUh1HrYOw" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

<h3>Background Rendering is Fucking Stupidly Implemented. Period.</h3>

<p>Step 1: Extract any format source footage from your media.</p>

<p>Step 2: Drag (or import) this media into <a href="http://www.Apple.com/finalcutpro">Final Cut Pro X</a>.</p>

<p>Step 3: Wait a few seconds.</p>

<p>Step 4: Start editing</p>

<p>Step 5: Go to step 3.</p>

<p>I am not kidding.</p>

<p>Open media in Final Cut Pro X and check out all the whiz-bang things that go crazy. Even if the media is already in Quicktime and in a format previously sanctioned by (and loved by) Apple.</p>

<p>The first thing I noticed was this tiny, iTunes-style "event circle" in the middle of Final Cut Pro X.</p>

<p><img src="http://www.ScruffyThinking.com/storage/blog-pictures/not-obvious.png" alt="Not Obvious" title="" /></p>

<p>Then, I checked my CPU usage, through the ever-helpful <a href="http://www.ragingmenace.com">MenuMeters</a>, which shows my CPUs are now pegged at 100%.</p>

<p><img src="http://www.ScruffyThinking.com/storage/blog-pictures/CPU.png" alt="CPU Usage" title="" /></p>

<p>I start editing footage. Adding transitions, moving things around in my <em>Timeline</em> (or <em>Storyline</em> or <em>new-word-thing</em>, whatever it is called now).</p>

<p>I hit PLAY.</p>

<p>Everything plays fine, but... when I stop editing, the rendering starts fresh, the bar atop the <em>unrendered</em> part of my footage/timeline/storyline/dingus changes color a few times and starts over where my effects have been placed.</p>

<p><img src="http://cdn.cbsi.com.au/story_media/339318183/Apple-Final-Cut-Pro-X_27.jpg" alt="dingus render" title="" /></p>

<p>I decide, this is far too much, and select the footage, then hit DELETE.</p>

<p><img src="http://www.ScruffyThinking.com/storage/blog-pictures/Delete-footage.png" alt="Cannot Delete" title="" /></p>

<h3>What I am really saying</h3>

<p>I am saying, even though Final Cut Pro 4/5/6/7 can playback in <em>real-time</em> without rendering everything you touch, Final Cut Pro X needs to do this bullshit background rendering shuffle.</p>

<p>I am saying Avid Media Composer, using the same exact footage, plays back in <em>real-time</em>, even with transitions and effects, and out "renders" when I export to tape or file.</p>

<p>What I am saying is, even if I go into the Preferences and uncheck the fetching "Render in the Background" option, Final Cut Pro X <em>still plays in real-time</em>, even with transitions and effects.</p>

<p><img src="http://www.ScruffyThinking.com/storage/blog-pictures/fcpx-rendering.png" alt="bkg render" title="" /></p>

<p>It is embarrassing and makes no sense. It takes processor and CPU utilization to a new level. It was designed for people who barely understand how iMovie works and need something that <em>just does</em> the things we would otherwise do later or we do not need to do at all.</p>

<h2>It looks expensive</h2>

<p>I recently had a <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/that-post-show/id293692362">great conversation on That Post Show</a> with several people, including <a href="http://theeditdoctor.tumblr.com">Mike J Nichols</a> and <a href="http://www.LarryJordan.biz">Larry Jordan</a> among others.</p>

<p>We talked a lot about Final Cut Pro X and were much more gracious than I am being in this entry.</p>

<h2>WtFCPX</h2>

<p>Mike has recently <a href="http://theeditdoctor.tumblr.com/post/8058875793/x-terminator-day-international-fcpx-refund-request">declared August 29, 2011 as "X" Terminator Day</a> and suggests we all ask for a refund of Final Cut Pro X on that day.</p>

<p>I cannot say I disagree completely with this notion.</p>

<h2>Avid</h2>

<p>Avid is offering <a href="http://www.avid.com/US/specialoffers/fcp-mc-promotion">Media Composer for $995 until September 30, 2011</a> if you already have Final Cut Pro (but not Version X).</p>

<p>And, if you are considering the move;</p>

<ul>
<li>Knowing more than one NLE is a good thing.</li>
<li>Most of "Hollywood" uses Avid.</li>
<li>Avid editors make more, on average, than Final Cut editors.</li>
<li>Avid doesn't have Background Rendering, thank the gods.</li>
</ul>

<p><em>Just some food for thought.</em></p>

<h3>Errata</h3>

<p>A few links you might want to read:</p>

<p><a href="http://forums.creativecow.net/thread/335/2388">Creative Cow on Quicktime</a></p>

<p><a href="http://boardreader.com/thread/FCPx_background_render_times_5wk4Xpb6l.html">Render times</a></p>

<p><a href="http://finalcutwhiz.com/misc/fcpx-or-not-to-fcpx/">FCP Whiz</a></p>

<p><a href="http://vimeo.com/groups/fcpx/forumthread:242163">Share rendering tip</a></p>

<p><a href="http://reduser.net/forum/showthread.php?60701-disabling-background-rendering-in-FCPX">RED User on disabling background rendering</a></p>

<p><a href="http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=1180893">Macrumors render time discussion</a></p>
]]></content></entry><entry><title>Not so clean, nor so simple...</title><category term="Avid"/><category term="FCPX"/><category term="Final Cut"/><category term="Logic"/><category term="Movies &amp; Film"/><category term="Premiere"/><category term="Pro Tools"/><id>http://scruffythinking.com/journal/2011/7/12/not-so-clean-nor-so-simple.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://scruffythinking.com/journal/2011/7/12/not-so-clean-nor-so-simple.html"/><author><name>Kanen</name></author><published>2011-07-13T05:10:29Z</published><updated>2011-07-13T05:10:29Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p><object width="640" height="390"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Qe89OeQ9i4Q&amp;hl=en_US&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;version=3"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Qe89OeQ9i4Q&amp;hl=en_US&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;version=3" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" width="640" height="390"></embed></object>
<br>
<small>A possibly bizarre horror short film I did in 2006, starring my wife.</p>

<p><br>
I threw this together in one evening, with no in camera sound, to compete in a George Romero Horror Competition (which I did not win). I had hoped it would feel like a 1970s horror flick, but -- apparently, George did not agree.</small></p>

<h2>Not so clean, nor simple</h2>

<p>I am currently working on four projects, plus a bit of consulting to pay the bills;</p>

<ul>
<li>kane-box</li>
<li>That Post Show (podcast)</li>
<li>Scruffy Thinking (podcast)</li>
<li>A Cyberpunk Superhero Project (video)</li>
</ul>

<p>The first project is written in C and Lisp and requires nothing more than a text editor. The podcasts are more demanding, requiring me to find and schedule guests, record the conversation, edit everything together and upload the results for inclusion in iTunes.</p>

<p>The last item… I cannot discuss much of it yet, but it requires editing together a ton of HD footage and creating complex visual effects.</p>

<h2>Decisions</h2>

<p>Life is full of decisions. In my case, I have two decisions I wrestle with on a near daily basis.</p>

<h3>Podcasting</h3>

<p>I have used GarageBand to edit the last several podcasts, from That Post Show episode X through Scruffy Thinking Episode 5. I have been consistently unhappy with the output from GarageBand.</p>

<p>My experience so far:</p>

<ul>
<li>Importing is very slow.</li>
</ul>

<p>I've tried everything from AIFF, MOV Audio, AAC and several variations. In every case, the <em>import</em> seems to take about a third the length of the actual audio clip, just to import.</p>

<p>Once imported, everything gets shoved into the "Project File", which is really just a container of audio and edits. This is good for copying the project around, but terrible for drive space and preservation of that space.</p>

<p>Why do I have or even need the file in two places? The only reasonable answer is; because the <em>converted</em> files go there.</p>

<ul>
<li>Editing is acceptable, but not great.</li>
</ul>

<p>Editing audio in GarageBand is marginally acceptable. If you are used to Pro Tools or Logic Pro (or even Soundtrack Pro), it borders on horrible.</p>

<p>Dragging clips around does strange overwrites. Nothing blends together. The audio tools are sub-par, if slightly functional, but anything which cleans up audio is a series of sliders and values that do little to show you what the final output might sound like, once exported.</p>

<ul>
<li>Podcasting is built into the application.</li>
</ul>

<p>This is nice. You an drag images into GarageBand, set Chapter Markers, provide HTML links and even write <em>Markdown</em> in the description. </p>

<p>Everything works well, with one surprising issue;</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>You cannot export as anything other than an MP3 or AAC, if the Podcast Track exists.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>One workaround I've discovered is, if you <em>hide</em> the Podcast Track, you can magically export as AIFF or another format, other than MP3 or AAC.</p>

<p>This matters if you use something like <a href="">Levelator</a>, which - you probably should, because the audio normalization in GarageBand is complete shit.</p>

<ul>
<li>Loudness and audio normalization are shit.</li>
</ul>

<p>Yes, I said <em>shit</em>. The "Loudness" checkbox in preferences does almost nothing to improve the audio quality of your output. Ostensibly, it is supposed to <em>analyze</em> and "make sure" loudness is uniform across the exported audio file. </p>

<p>In reality, it simply guarantees your audio file, once exported, sounds <em>nothing like</em> the reference audio you were enjoying in the GarageBand application.</p>

<p>In every case, the audio in GarageBand and the exported audio from GarageBand (regardless of settings), are more like third cousins than immediate family. This is regardless of the exported audio format, the bit rate or the checkboxes in the application.</p>

<ul>
<li>Alternatively, Pro Tools or Logic Pro?</li>
</ul>

<p>Pro Tools is expensive and requires third-party hardware, some of which is cost prohibitive for podcasting. I love Pro Tools and have used it for years, but having to buy a $299 (or more) piece of hardware, just to make Pro Tools work, is completely idiotic to me.</p>

<p>I edit podcasts on a MacBook Air (which has <em>plenty</em> of processing power for audio), but I am already out of USB ports when I connect a mouse and external hard drive. Like Avid Media Composer and the hardware dongle, this is where Pro Tools fails.</p>

<p>Logic Pro has another set of issues. The application has not really been updated in over <em>two years</em>. Even if it had been updated, it does little to allow one to properly export to a podcast, with images and notes.</p>

<p>Worse, Logic Studio Pro requires over 50 Gigabytes of hard drive space for a full install, which makes it nearly impossible to cram onto a MacBook Air.</p>

<h3>Media and Effects</h3>

<p>Final Cut Pro X was released last month. I have been cutting on Avid and Final Cut Pro for a very long time. I am very familiar with media and visual effects (see <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm2652784/">IMDB</a> for some info).</p>

<p>I have written a script and I am putting together some footage for a pilot episode of a modern, web-based, cyberpunk superhero story.</p>

<p>Over the last few weeks, I have started to dig into NLEs again (see <a href="http://www.ThatPostShow.com">That Post Show</a> for a bit more info).</p>

<p>In thinking about the final version, I essentially have three choices:</p>

<ul>
<li>Final Cut Pro X + Motion 5</li>
<li>Adobe Premiere + After Effects</li>
<li>Avid Media Composer + After Effects or Motion 5</li>
</ul>

<p>In my case, I vastly prefer Avid over Premiere, but I seriously love the way Adobe has integrated Premiere and After Effects in their CS5.5 line of production tools.</p>

<p>I have played with Final Cut Pro X (and, unlike many others, I actually love using it), but a seriously worry about doing complicated visual effects in FCPX, because the ability to go from FCPX to After Effects (or anything else, for that matter) is either impossible or so difficult as to be impractical.</p>

<p>So, I'm stuck with:</p>

<p>Use Avid, which I love, but have an Avid + After Effects workflow.</p>

<p>Use Premiere and After Effects, seamlessly, but with a steep learning curve and an application not many other people use (Premiere).</p>

<p>Use the new Final Cut, along with the new Motion, but cut my teeth on a very unproven workflow.</p>

<h3>More Decisions</h3>

<p><a href="http://twitter.com/5tu">@5tu</a>, the guy who writes <a href="http://www.prolost.com">the ProLost blog</a> called me a dilettante the other day, at a <a href="http://www.redgiantsoftware.com">Red Giant Software</a> party in San Francisco.</p>

<p>He meant it as a compliment, I think. He was talking about early adoption and people (like me) who are willing to use the latest and greatest thing, in a kind of hobbyist way, without worrying about the standards of the industry.</p>

<p>As such, I am tempted to push my way into Final Cut Pro X and Motion and see where it takes me.</p>

<p>After all, by the time the project is finished, Final Cut X will probably have XML export, multi cam support and a slew of other missing features from the current version.</p>

<p>Then again, my pal <a href="http://www.scottsimmons.tv">Scott</a> has been talking up Premiere lately.</p>

<p>Then, there's this <a href="http://www.alilassoued.com/video_ali_lassoued/fcpx_vs_premiere_pro_cs_5-5">Final Cut Pro X vs. Premiere</a> blog entry.</p>

<p><em>Too many choices or not enough information? It's hard to say yet.</em></p>
]]></content></entry><entry><title>unfocused thoughts</title><category term="Philosophy"/><category term="Scruffy Thinking"/><category term="Technology"/><category term="focus"/><id>http://scruffythinking.com/journal/2011/7/4/unfocused-thoughts.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://scruffythinking.com/journal/2011/7/4/unfocused-thoughts.html"/><author><name>Kanen</name></author><published>2011-07-04T21:21:17Z</published><updated>2011-07-04T21:21:17Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://LifeZero.org/storage/blog-pictures/Unfocused.png" alt="Unfocused" title="" /></p>

<p><small>Photo taken with a <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B001SER48I/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=scrufthink-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=217145&amp;creative=399369&amp;creativeASIN=B001SER48I">Canon SD780 IS</a></small></p>

<h2>An unfocused, long and winding entry about things I love</h2>

<p>It is hard to stay focused. Many things capture our attention. Too many interruptions prevent us from realizing our full potential.</p>

<p>I am the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kwisatz_Haderach">Kwisatz Haderach</a> of distraction. I tend to find something I am interested in, follow it to the ends of the earth, then -- eventually -- decide whether I want to pursue it further and do anything with the months (possibly years) of knowledge I've accumulated on the trail of <em>said interesting thing</em>.</p>

<p>This can be both a blessing and a curse. It can cause others to look into my life and believe me to be unfocused and it causes immediate family to consider the possibility of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ADHD">ADHD</a>.</p>

<p>The thing is, I'm not <em>unfocused</em> nor am I incapable of finishing something I've started. I just get interested in way too many things, which causes me to always be searching.</p>

<h3>That Pesky OS X Dock</h3>

<p><img src="http://lifezero.org/storage/blog-pictures/2011%20Dock.png" alt="OS X Dock" title="" /></p>

<p>I have tried, and mostly failed, to keep my dock under control. The dock is a strange and wonderful place, where applications go to live or they go to die a horrible death, seen but completely ignored forever.</p>

<p>My Dock represents applications in <em>roughly</em> the order of importance or their order of use on my system. In my case, the Finder takes top spot and cannot change position, and is then followed by:</p>

<ul>
<li>Google Chrome</li>
<li>The <a href="http://sparrowmailapp.com">Sparrow</a> Mail Client, which has completely replaced the dumb-as-dirt Apple Mail</li>
<li>Twitter</li>
<li>AdiumX, which integrates into Facebook, AIM and Skype for chat</li>
<li>Skype, which I have to use for work &amp; calls</li>
<li><a href="http://reederapp.com/">Reeder App</a> which is the best RSS reader ever made</li>
<li>iA Writer and ByWord, because I haven't decided on the <em>One True Editor</em> yet (see below)</li>
<li>TextMate for writing code</li>
<li>Lightroom, which recently replaced iPhoto+Others</li>
<li>Terminal, always open</li>
<li><a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/acorn-the-image-editor-for/id402280036?mt=12">Acorn</a>, the Image Editor for Humans</li>
<li>GarageBand for podcasting (see below)</li>
<li>Final Cut Pro X</li>
<li>iTunes, always open</li>
<li>App Store</li>
<li>And, <a href="http://www.videolan.org">VLC</a>, which is open, but normally not in the dock, and plays all my media files</li>
</ul>

<h3>Pens and paper</h3>

<p>As much as everyone loves the idea of getting away from pen and paper, the reality is that pen and paper are a necessity. Sure, I'd love to pull out my fancy, lightweight, digital writing tool and just whip through some quick notes. But that is not a reality.</p>

<p>The iPad goes a long way toward making this easier, but the iPad is 1.5 lbs (.6 kg) and not easily put in your pocket along with a small writing device. By the time the iPad has been pulled out of a bag, turned on, navigated to the proper application and then used to jot down a quick note, the person has lost interest in sharing the information -- or worse -- the information has already passed you by and you no longer remember the details.</p>

<p>As such, a small notebook and pen or pencil are difficult to replace.</p>

<p>An aside about the iPhone:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Likely, you believe you can just grab the iPhone, write something quickly, then be done with it. That is mostly true for phone numbers, names and text-based information. But, when something even slightly more complicated happens, the iPhone fails where a $1 notepad and 25 cent pen succeed.</p>
</blockquote>

<h3>Loving on Paper</h3>

<p>I have tried probably three dozen different types of pens and paper. I have done my best to find the one that works in almost every situation. So far, only three stand out as "You must own one" from the 30+ I've used over the last decade.</p>

<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.notebookstories.com/2009/11/16/review-doane-paper-notebooks/">Doane Paper grid + lines</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B003QSS59Q/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=scrufthink-20">Field Notes Brand</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B003U2SH28/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=scrufthink-20">Kikkerland WritersBlok</a></li>
</ul>

<p>I also love <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B003U2SH1Y/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=scrufthink-20">WritersBlok Small Grid notebooks</a>.</p>

<h3>The Actual Writing</h3>

<p>Over the last year, at the advice of a few <a href="http://www.merlinmann.com">smart people</a>, I've moved all my creative writing into text-based formats. I believe Markdown support is pretty much the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lingua_franca">lingua franca</a> of the modern writing world and could not imagine writing HTML or Rich Text Format documents at all anymore.</p>

<p>Text files sync easily and quickly. The changes can be seen, without a huge amount of effort. They can be put into a versioning system and you can <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diff">see the diff</a> between several versions easily.</p>

<p>The fact that more people are not writing in Markdown is surprising to me. Heck, even <a href="http://www.squarespace.com/display/ShowHelp?section=Markdown">SquareSpace supports Markdown</a> as one of their default formatting options.</p>

<h3>iPad vs. Mac</h3>

<p>For almost a year, I <a href="http://www.scruffythinking.com/journal/2010/8/17/ipad-mobile-kung-fu-replacing-a-netbook.html">used only the iPad as my primary computer</a>. Then, I started doing heavy development and needed something with a terminal prompt, local storage and a keyboard attached. I used a Netbook for a while, running Linux.</p>

<p>Now, I use the MacBook Air 11" almost exclusively for everything I do, uncluding video editing and podcasting. I cannot imagine going back to anything else.</p>

<p>I intend to move to a 13" MacBook Air, once <a href="http://www.macstories.net/news/what-is-thunderbolt/">Thunderbolt</a> has been added to the system and OS X Lion has been officially released.</p>

<h3>Text Editor</h3>

<p>I have spent years trying to find the <em>one true text editor</em> (on the Mac and/or iPad). </p>

<p>It has to support <a href="http://daringfireball.net/projects/markdown/syntax">Markdown</a>, as I use Markdown for everything these days, including my web site and blog posts (even SquareSpace now supports Markdown).</p>

<p>Also cool to note, iTunes supports Markdown if you add it to your podcast description. It translates Markdown to HTML for your podcast item in iTunes.</p>

<p>I've stared at and used:</p>

<ul>
<li><a href="http://macromates.com/">TextMate</a></li>
<li><a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/byword/id420212497?mt=12">ByWord</a></li>
<li><a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/ia-writer/id439623248?mt=12">iA Writer</a></li>
<li><a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/id412347921?mt=12">Omm Writer Dana II</a></li>
</ul>

<p>Of these tools, my go to app for writing code is TextMate. Although it is a bit long in the tooth and needs an update, the Bundles and the color themes make it the best code editor on the Mac, in my opinion.</p>

<p>Some people use TextMate for writing blogs and text-based documents, but I like to create a separation of creative writing and writing code, so I am always interested in finding a pure text editor for my creative writing efforts.</p>

<p>I've tried BBEdit, TextWrangler and others, but the three which have stuck with me are <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/byword/id420212497?mt=12">ByWord</a>, <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/ia-writer/id439623248?mt=12">iA Writer</a> and <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/id412347921?mt=12">Omm Writer Dana II</a>.</p>

<p>Of these three tools, all of which I love dearly, the two I keep going back to are iA Writer and ByWord.</p>

<h3>About iA Writer</h3>

<p><img src="http://lifezero.org/storage/blog-pictures/iA%20Writer.png" alt="iA Writer Photo" title="" /></p>

<p><a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/ia-writer/id439623248?mt=12">iA Writer</a> is beautiful. It works well, the default (and only) font is pretty great, if a bit larger than I'd like and the whole thing seems to be a perfect fit for writing <a href="http://daringfireball.net/projects/markdown/syntax">Markdown</a>.</p>

<p>In fact, iA Writer formats Markdown so well, it makes writing Markdown seem more like a standard way of writing text than anything else you'd use as a formatting option.</p>

<p>iA Writer has no preferences, so you get what you get.</p>

<p>The one <em>major</em> complaint about the software is the default window size for a new text document, which seems geared toward a Netbook screen because it is wide, but not very tall.</p>

<p><a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/ia-writer/id439623248?mt=12">iA Writer is $17.99 US in the App Store</a></p>

<h3>About ByWord</h3>

<p><img src="http://lifezero.org/storage/blog-pictures/iA%20Writer.png" alt="Byword Photo" title="" /></p>

<p>My new, and with a few changes, favorite text editor has to be <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/byword/id420212497?mt=12">ByWord</a>. It has come on strong, features a full-screen mode (just like iA Writer) and has all the features of iA Writer, except for one: inline Markdown syntax.</p>

<p>However, <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/byword/id420212497?mt=12">ByWord</a> features three things that make it potentially better than iA Writer:</p>

<ol>
<li>The ability to write in Rich Text Format.</li>
<li>The ability to change the default font.</li>
<li>The ability to change the background from white to black.</li>
</ol>

<p>Luckily, you can preview Markdown and export to HTML with a few clicks or a single hot-key, which gives it a similar feel as iA Writer, at almost half the price.</p>

<p>My <em>major</em> complaint about ByWord is the seemingly unecessary space at the top and bottom of the interface when writing, so I lose screen space. This annoys me enough to push me back into iA Writer at least once during any writing session.</p>

<p>Otherwise, it is only <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/byword/id420212497?mt=12">$9.99 in the App Store</a> and is very fast and functional.</p>

<h3>Podcasts</h3>

<p>I have killed the <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/life-zero/id281457646">Life Zero</a> podcast in favor of <a href="http://www.scruffythinking.com/scruffy/">Scruffy Thinking</a> which is <em>coming soon</em>.</p>

<p>I have restarted the <a href="http://www.scruffythinking.com/thatpostshow">That Post Show</a> podcast <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/that-post-show/id293692362">available in iTunes</a> after a two-year hiatus.</p>

<p>As part of this process, and the process of simplification of applications on my system, I decided to edit in <a href="http://www.apple.com/ilife/garageband/">GarageBand</a> instead of <a href="http://www.avid.com/US/products/family/pro-tools">Pro Tools</a> or <a href="http://www.apple.com/logicstudio/logicpro/">Logic Pro</a>.</p>

<p>After all, GarageBand comes with the Mac, supports Podcasting by default and even allows you to add a photo for your podcast and "liner notes" to anything you export.</p>

<p>Pro Tools, which I love, is too expensive for just podcasting, has a steep learning curve and is yet-another-application to be installed.</p>

<p>Logic Pro seems all but abandoned by Apple and requires over 30 Gigabytes of Hard Drive to install, so it was a kind of no-go for my podcasting efforts.</p>

<p>While I like, but not love, GarageBand. I can tell you with certainty that -- so far -- the audio output is vastly inferior to that of Pro Tools or Logic Pro. This is something I am working on for future podcasts.</p>

<h3>Development</h3>

<p>I already talked about TextMate a bit. I write C and Lisp code (almost every day) and I'll talk more about those topics in the future.</p>

<h2>Errata</h2>

<p>I had planned to discuss reading, social networks and a few more issues, but I just ran into the soft limit of article length I've given myself, so I'll save those for another day.</p>
]]></content></entry><entry><title>Scruffy!</title><category term="Philosophy"/><category term="Podcasts"/><category term="Scruffy Thinking"/><id>http://scruffythinking.com/journal/2011/7/2/scruffy.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://scruffythinking.com/journal/2011/7/2/scruffy.html"/><author><name>Kanen</name></author><published>2011-07-03T01:44:22Z</published><updated>2011-07-03T01:44:22Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://lifezero.squarespace.com/storage/hofstadter.png" alt="hofstadter" title="" /></p>

<h2>Scruffies vs. Neats</h2>

<p>I am not the creator of this <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neats_vs._scruffies">phrase</a>, but I might just be one of its biggest proponents.</p>

<p>From Wikipedia:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>The distinction was originally made by Roger Schank in the mid-1970s to characterize the difference between his work on natural language processing (which represented commonsense knowledge in the form of large amorphous semantic networks) from the work of John McCarthy, Alan Newell, Herbert Simon, Robert Kowalski and others whose work was based on logic and formal extensions of logic.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>I would strongly suggest you read the entire <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neats_vs._scruffies">Wikipedia entry</a> on the subject, although you might find yourself with a dozen open tabs and/or <a href="http://readability.com">Readability</a> or <a href="http://www.instapaper.com">Instapaper</a> links by the end of your journey.</p>

<h2>Writing as Art (plus Journaling)</h2>

<p>I enjoy writing. I write a blog, which you are presumably reading right now, either in a browser or an RSS feed wrangler. These thoughts don't just form and then appear as text, they require (possibly too much) thought and many notes before they make it onto the Internet.</p>

<p>Like many people, I am constantly searching for a great, small notebook and pen (or pencil). </p>

<p>I've tried Moleskin and cannot stand them because they:</p>

<ul>
<li>are too expensive</li>
<li>do not lay flat</li>
<li>have horrible paper (to me, anyway)</li>
<li>are inflexible (the binding, I mean)</li>
</ul>

<p>About two months ago, I discovered the answer to my writing prayers.</p>

<p><img src="http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/41zPXaYwgXL._SL500_AA300_.jpg" alt="WritersBlok" title="" /></p>

<p>They are called WritersBlok and come in several versions:</p>

<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B003U2SGWY?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=scrufthink-20">Dotted</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B003LPVJHY?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=scrufthink-20">Ruled</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B002TDE9EY?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=scrufthink-20">Plain</a></li>
</ul>

<p>They are between $4 US and $6 US for THREE notebooks. They have great paper, donate a portion of the revenue to charity and just rock.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.notebookstories.com/2009/01/28/kikkerland-writersblok-notebooks-now-available/">Others have praised these</a> small notebooks as well.</p>

<h3>You gotta write with something</h3>

<p>I love fountain pens. They flow in a way other pens do not flow, but they are typically expensive and have a leakage problem.</p>

<p>Around the same time I discovered the notebooks above, I stumbled across a pen and tried it, then immediatly fell in love.</p>

<p><img src="http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/11qQBRZ-LBL._SL500_AA300_.jpg" alt="Varsity" title="" /></p>

<p>It is called the <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B001E6C1KQ?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=scrufthink-20">Varsity Disposable Fountain Pen</a> and comes in blue or black (or a pack of colors). The unit cost is between $1 US and $7 US, depending on how much the distributor steals from you.</p>

<p>They are <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B001E6C1KQ?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=scrufthink-20">$3 each on Amazon</a> or a <a href="http://t.co/x2EIjfr">pack of 12 for $24 US</a>.</p>

<p>Wow.</p>

<h2>Podcasting as a Medium</h2>

<p>All of this has me thinking about podcasting. </p>

<p>I took a short, two year break from media and recently returned. I took a hard look at the <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/life-zero/id281457646">Life Zero podcast</a> and read the reviews (some of which are pretty rough) and thought a lot about what kind of things I want to say online and in podcasts.</p>

<p>I decided to quit recording the Life Zero podcast and focus more on podcasts like <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/that-media-show/id285582623">That Media Show</a> and <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/that-post-show/id293692362">That Post Show</a> which I enjoyed more and which made me happier.</p>

<p>I also reset a number of things in my own life and have had a <a href="http://www.ionhunter.com">few changes this year</a> which have caused me to consider my time and how I want to spend it.</p>

<h2>Scruffy Thinking</h2>

<p>I starting writing a book, called <em>Scruffy Thinking</em>, which is a kind of Life Zero meets Technology meets Philosophy look at everything from programming to just solving problems, with examples that range from equations to Lisp.</p>

<p>I assume this book will take as long as it takes and I am in no hurry to finish it.</p>

<h3>The Podcast Version</h3>

<p>Because I <em>love the subject matter</em> so much, it occurred to me that a <em>Scruffy Thinking</em> podcast makes more sense than a Life Zero podcast and allows me a better variety of guests, many more topics and a much stronger voice about things I -- and hopefully you -- find interesting.</p>

<p>So, this month (July), I'm launching the <a href="http://www.lifezero.org/scruff">podcast</a> and plan to cover everything from computers to programming and even film.</p>

<h3>call for participants</h3>

<p>If you are interested in being on any of the shows, you should send me an email at <a href="&#x6D;a&#105;&#108;&#x74;&#111;:&#109;&#x65;&#64;&#x4C;&#105;&#x66;&#101;&#90;&#101;r&#111;&#46;&#111;&#x72;&#103;">&#109;&#x65;&#64;&#x4C;&#105;&#x66;&#101;&#90;&#101;r&#111;&#46;&#111;&#x72;&#103;</a> and let me know which topic you are passionate about and a bit about why you'd like to be on that show.</p>

<h3><em>Possible</em> Upcoming Show Topics</h3>

<p>I have considered many show topics for the first few months of the podcast. Below are a few topics, along with the assertion (or starting point) about each topic we will discuss.</p>

<ul>
<li>The Genius of 2011</li>
</ul>

<blockquote>
  <p>Where is the da Vinci of this generation? Where is the Einstein? Where is the Feynman? Is it possible to be the Einstein of 2011? Are there examples of such a person… or has that time in our history passed us by?</p>
</blockquote>

<ul>
<li>Reading is Dead</li>
</ul>

<blockquote>
  <p>Has reading books for pleasure died? Are digital books the future? Do we read more or less today than we did a few decades ago?</p>
</blockquote>

<ul>
<li>Customer Server failed</li>
</ul>

<blockquote>
  <p>What happened to customer service? Is it a lack of power given to the customer service person or do companies simply no longer care?</p>
</blockquote>

<ul>
<li>Time and Attention Spans</li>
</ul>

<blockquote>
  <p>What does the attention span of a twenty-something today look like compared to twenty years ago? Is is better, worse or the same?</p>
</blockquote>

<ul>
<li>Indie Film is dead</li>
</ul>

<blockquote>
  <p>Have blockbuster films killed the indie spirit?</p>
</blockquote>

<ul>
<li>Star Trek vs. Stargate</li>
</ul>

<blockquote>
  <p>Star Trek is better than Stargate. Or, is it the other way around?</p>
</blockquote>

<ul>
<li>Open Source Licenses</li>
</ul>

<blockquote>
  <p>GPL vs. BSD vs. LGPL -- what does it all mean?</p>
</blockquote>

<p>… and many more to come.</p>
]]></content></entry><entry><title>The State of Film</title><category term="Movies &amp; Film"/><category term="film"/><id>http://scruffythinking.com/journal/2011/6/25/the-state-of-film.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://scruffythinking.com/journal/2011/6/25/the-state-of-film.html"/><author><name>Kanen</name></author><published>2011-06-25T22:16:04Z</published><updated>2011-06-25T22:16:04Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p><object style="height: 390px; width: 640px"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/xTWZhu3BugQ?version=3"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/xTWZhu3BugQ?version=3" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" width="640" height="390"></object></p>

<h2>An Aside</h2>

<p>If you have not already done so, go to <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/that-post-show/id293692362">That Post Show</a> and download the latest episode (or the entire series) and rate it on iTunes. <em>After a two-year hiatus, we are back!</em></p>

<h2>What I mean</h2>

<p>Film has undergone a massive shift in my lifetime. I fondly remember, as a kid, everyone speaking about <a href="http://www.thegodfather.com/">The Godfather</a> as if it were the pinacle of modern cinema.</p>

<p>And, you know what… if it wasn't the crowning achievement, it was at least <em>perfection adjacent</em>.</p>

<p>Over the years, I started watching and appreciating movies. From the time I was a kid and finally saw <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three_Days_of_the_Condor">Three Days of the Condor</a> until I was older and blown away by <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Wrestler_(2008_film)">The Wrestler</a>.</p>

<p>I like good movies. I appreciate plot. I believe something can be <em>slow</em>, but quite good, and offer a substantial intellectual and emotional payoff, without all the extras found in forgettable cinema of today.</p>

<h3>The last decade</h3>

<p>The last decade has brought many good movies to us. <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0375063/">Sideways</a> by Alexander Payne is one such example. <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0469494/">There Will Be Blood</a> by Paul Thomas Anderson is another. <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0268126/">Adaptation</a> was brilliant.</p>

<p>The list goes on, but it is not as long as one would expect, given how easy it is to make a film today compared to thirty years ago.</p>

<p>Also, these movies were released in 2004, 2007 and 2002 respectively. That's a wide gap between being explosive and being impressive.</p>

<h2>I am Not alone</h2>

<p><img src="http://s3.amazonaws.com/twitpic/photos/full/265152094.png?AWSAccessKeyId=AKIAJF3XCCKACR3QDMOA&amp;Expires=1309041465&amp;Signature=E3Cx3SFQXLdi5VGFtD65VOoEAOc%3D" alt="T5" title="" /></p>

<p>Even <a href="http://www.nbc.com/30-rock/">30 Rock</a> makes fun of movies, with their <em>Transformers: Written by No One</em> faux movie poster.</p>

<h3>Why I am on this point</h3>

<p>With the release of <a href="http://www.apple.com/finalcutpro/">Final Cut Pro X</a>, there has been a huge backlash against the product from <em>seasoned professional editors</em>. Even <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LxKYuF9pENQ">Conan O'Brian</a> took a stab at the software, before <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/25/apple-product-managers-respond-to-final-cut-pro-x-criticism/?a_dgi=aolshare_twitter">Apple Product Managers</a> responded to criticism and poor App Store reviews.</p>

<p>We even did a nearly two-hour <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/that-post-show/id293692362">That Post Show</a> about the software, where we mostly complained about missing features and other issues.</p>

<p><em>Apple has released a small update, since the show, which adds several CODECs and fixes a few issues, but the major problems are still there.</em></p>

<p>Regardless of our conversation or of anything else said in the heat of the moment, the reality is this: Good films are hard to find and are not being released with any frequency.</p>

<p>Should we blame the software for this problem?</p>

<h3>There is no Kubrick</h3>

<p>The last decade has not brought forth another Kubrick. If you have read <a href="https://www.readability.com/articles/mawwgb9m#">The Letters of Stanley Kubrick</a>, you understand exactly what I mean by this.</p>

<p>No filmmaker today has this level of detail, focus and belief in the film they are producing.</p>

<p>I say this because I am saddened by it, not because I mean to attack or criticize the current generation of filmmakers.</p>

<h3>Great movies today?</h3>

<p>I am certain there are great movies being released. </p>

<p>Apparently <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0478304/">Tree of Life</a> is quite good, although - at this point - I haven't yet seen it.</p>

<p>No one ever appreciates a film as a classic, except in retrospect.</p>

<h2>My own so-far-failed attempt</h2>

<p>In 2007, I wrote and directed a film called <em>Jake Forgotten</em>, which was based on an original screenplay. The screenplay loosely followed the <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Jake-Forgotten-ebook/dp/B001BZF8NC">novel</a>, also written by me.</p>

<p>I say this because, I believe, there is a film in there. I have something to say, I believe I captured some footage and decent acting, but I have not yet been able to finish properly telling the story.</p>

<p>Maybe, someday, I'll take the time. And, it might just be on <em>Final Cut Pro X</em>, because - after all - it's the story, not the tool, right?</p>

<p>... now, go <a href="http://www.films101.com/yl10r.htm">read about the best films in the last decade</a>.</p>
]]></content></entry></feed>
